Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia the free lunch

Wikipedia the free lunch was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Not encyclopedic, personal opinion. Gerritholl 13:39, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * Not meant to be; the author raises some excellent points in a place likely to attract the attention of the Big Enchiladas &#8212; but Delete. &#8212; Bill 13:52, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-encyclopedic. --G Rutter 13:56, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Gotta go with the non-encyclopedic diagnosis. Delete --Neschek 16:13, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research. Also not encyclopedic. --Improv 17:51, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Move to User:Faedra/Wikipedia the free lunch. RickK 19:07, Oct 11, 2004 (UTC)
 * Move to Meta or user subpage. &#8212;No-One Jones (m) 19:08, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, clearly original research. Move to user subpage. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 00:23, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. No useful content for the article namespace, some new ideas but mostly old stuff we see far too regularly. See why Wikipedia is not so great; Not much to merge is there? If the author later wishes to move this to a user page or the meta, I'll be happy to provide them with a copy. Andrewa 01:05, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Essay, not encyclopedic.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 03:18, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.