Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia widow

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Author request. All edits by single author with the exception of those who added vfd or speedy tags. --HappyCamper 23:47, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia widow
(And although it should go to RfD, WP:WID too.) Not notable, Delete. brenneman (t) (c)  02:46, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, self-referential wanking is not encyclopedic. Nandesuka 03:09, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article admits to being original research/speculation (and it's silly). Eric119 03:43, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete (or userfy). Neologism. Flowerparty 03:48, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I'll admit it's rather funny. I might copy-and-paste the text, change it to "Webwidow", and distribute it to my e-mail buddies as a joke, but delete it from here. Think I could sell it to George Carlin or David Cross and make a few bucks?  The_Iconoclast 22:27, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.