Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedian Elitism

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:53, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedian Elitism
Apparently Mr. Chauncy Covington arrived on Wikipedia and set up a vanity page for himself. He was scolded for doing so (see his talk page) and has retaliated by writing an article featuring the views of Chauncy Covington, "existentialist philosopher", on his perceived enemies at Wikipedia, the "elitists". This page has no value aside from its unintentional humor. Delete. Zora 15:44, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * delete obviously --Bucephalus 15:50, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC) Vote formated to standards by Asriel86 16:47, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, while the article is humerous to an extend I agree with it to an extent. --Asriel86 16:47, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. But as a "Wikipedian Eitist" (sic), I would say that... P Ingerson 16:49, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Oh my God, it is a Discordian prank! The thing is, most pranks are not funny. Especially those executed with the use of hipster diction. 195.148.74.159 18:11, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I, as a being, am too far removed to know not to vote delete. Meelar (talk) 19:02, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, vandalism. N-Man'talk 19:06, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Whatever is good for the common community, this ain't it. Delete. DJ Clayworth 19:41, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Funny. Delete.Feydey 20:07, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, rant, meets "original research" deletion criterion but contains nothing we haven't heard at least once a month in someone's temper tantrum. Not nearly funny enough for BJAODN.  Not worth cleanup.  I'm torn between "don't bite the newbies" and "wipe your poopy undershorts, your philosophy is smelly."  Barno 20:40, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mis-spelled pursui--Kyknos 19:06, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)t. Incorrectly wikified Aristotle. That's enough for me. -- 8^D gab 22:36, 2005 Apr 8 (UTC)
 * Delete, POV essay. Also provides false info as the author didn't develop the concept "Wikipedian elitism". Mgm|(talk) 22:47, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Additional comment: The concept has already been described disgrunted vandals (I'm not saying the anon is one), so it's not new at all. Mgm|(talk) 22:52, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, article not created by a member of the cabal. RickK 23:16, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mildly amusing, perhaps even mildy factual, but totally inappropriate. Indrian 01:10, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete  POV essay --AYArktos 01:21, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete AMusing and to a certain extent true.Xiaoping choi 05:29, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh dear!  I read the article and discovered I was a pseudo intelectual and all this time I thought I was a real one.    'delete but keep his neologism, "benfactual"   ping 08:02, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * So true! Delete as neologism, original research, vanity and because the contributor is a poopy-head. Dpbsmith (talk) 17:11, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * That was me that "scolded" him on his talk page, although I was trying to avoid that impression. Our friend Chauncy seems to regard Wikipedia as a forum for original research and self-promotion... Delete. —Miles (Talk) 17:55, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Rhobite 05:19, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and Burn the author This is heresy. Unless these weeds are dealth with they'll poison everything. --Kyknos 19:06, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep You guys do kinda suck.
 * Comment made by 69.168.38.25
 * Delete. POV. Personal research. No credible third party references. Zzyzx11 | Talk 20:09, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV rant.  Elitism is good, though I'll stop short of jumping on the "Jimbo says" bandwagon. Chris talk back 23:34, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) Delete. Elitism is something different than what I see on Wikipedia, should it be mess on WP... Pavel Vozenilek 00:50, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn povcruft. ComCat 06:28, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.