Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikiqint1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. DS 19:36, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Wikiqint1
Tagged as spam, contested, so bringing here. Read the article, I think it says more than any nomination ever could. Just zis Guy you know? 10:19, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * delete not necessarily spam but definitely not an article. Someone using Wikipedia as scratch paper for their business presentation?  Dismas|(talk) 10:21, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * delete per above. Metamagician3000 10:50, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Dismas   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  12:17, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not (strictly) spam, but not encyclopedic either. -- MarcoTolo 16:42, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: whatever it is, WP isn't that. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:22, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - the creator probably never saw the first speedy tag - just forced a save of their version after an "edit conflict" message. -- RHaworth 19:06, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.