Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikiwhack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete. RobertG's initial impulse turned out to be correct. As per this edit, the original author of the article and  appear to be one and the same. 195.194.74.215 placed a banner at the top of the article pointing out that "this page is satire" to the "humor-impaired". I have therefore speedily deleted the article for being an admitted joke article. Uncle G 15:27, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Wikiwhack
Neologism, non-notable, self-referential. But for the fact that it violates WP:BEANS it should anyway probably be in Wikipedia: namespace. My impulse was to speedy delete, but on balance I decided it perhaps required consensus. RobertG &#9836; talk 11:24, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. unverifyable, OR. 25 google hits theres already WikiWhacking anyway Astrokey44 12:35, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Do not delete. Is more popular than WikiWhacking as well as being completely different. Already popular with students. Billbones 13:57, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as self-referential. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 13:55, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.