Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikkidiction


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 05:38, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Wikkidiction
Neologism/Protologism with 0 google hits. Delete per WP:NEO --Hansnesse 09:17, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, self reference. Unoriginal and uninformative as we already have Wikipediholic.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-02-03 12:02Z 
 * Delete per all above. PJM 12:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Quarl. MLA 13:36, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I just found a remarkably similar word, Wikidiction, was already deleted, Articles for deletion/Wikidiction. Can we speedy per recreation on deleted pages? --Hansnesse 20:34, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and encourage author to seek help for their Wiki-problem. Adrian Lamo · (talk)  · (mail) · 20:34, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Royboycrashfan 21:19, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ASR. Stifle 01:23, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Wikipediholic (which also sounds like a stupid article I'm afraid, but if we have that then this title should redirect there). Donama 06:18, 6 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.