Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wil Dasovich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. In the light of discovered sources, this leans towards a keep. However, if anyone were to challenge them, it could be renominated with arguments refuting those sources. (non-admin closure) — Yashtalk stalk 06:42, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Wil Dasovich

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a promotional article about a person who is successful in promoting himself but is not otherwise notable. All of the Google hits just show a woozle effect. The references are not reliable sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:59, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:BIO. Non-noteable online personality. Comatmebro  User talk:Comatmebro 03:02, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   03:13, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Bluemask (talk) 06:16, 18 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Pinoy Big Brother: Lucky 7, where he was a housemate. Blogging itself isn't enough to establish notability unless the blogger or blog has been covered in reliable sources, and/or has won an award. From what I can find online, there isn't much coverage about him that doesn't have to do with PBB (indeed, one of the only significant sources I could find is from the ABS-CBN-affiliate website Push). While the aforementioned Push article states that he won some kind of award "Influencer of the Year", I don't think that's enough to establish notability. However, he is a possible search term, and thus I don't see harm in redirecting his article to the PBB season he participated in. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:39, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Change to keep per the sources mentioned below. There seems to be just enough to establish notability, though the article could use some improvement. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:21, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 21 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep "Notability" or being "notable" is subjective. Assuming but not conceding to the loose definition (as may be inferred from above comments) that notability is simply recognizability, that standard puts in shade thousands of articles of people who have no media mileage. These articles include those about clerics who may not have enough newspaper mentions but are still important to the organization or in certain cases, for historical archiving. Nevertheless, subject personality has, in fact, enjoyed a certain level of media attention before and after his stint as housemate of Pinoy Big Brother. Since no metric has been suggested either, we should recognize that subject personality has more than four hundred thousand subscribers on Youtube at the time of writing of this comment and has at least appeared on a number of television shows in the Philippines. User:Doocool

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 05:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep having a look through Google news and the sources provided on this afd I think he passes WP:GNG. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 17:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:52, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep He may meeting GNG, as Google news found quite good sources. --Elton-Rodrigues (talk) 03:51, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:11, 2 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep NOTE: As of May 9, 2017 1:09AM GMT+8, I have expanded the article with additional information and references. User:Doocool


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.