Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wil Harris (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 21:35, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Wil_Harris
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Wil Harris now falls under the category of "not notable". He is no longer a technology journalist, nor does he appear regularly on the podcasts mentioned. He is neither a figure of public interest or has accomplished anything of note. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iainthompson (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Notability doesn't expire just because it seems like he left the field. Reading his Twitter he just came back from CES, so I'm not seeing any proof he's out of technology journalism. Plenty sourced for a stub.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 06:07, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete 153,000 people went to CES. Reading a published article he has written from the event is very much different than a tweet mentioning he went. That aside, being a guest on a podcast does still not meet Notability guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.222.40.236 (talk) 22:33, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wifione  Message 03:40, 25 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep WP:Notability is not temporary. Apparently he was in podcasts and is a journalist. Passes WP:GNG. A412  (Talk * C) 01:05, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No proof of current journalist status, nor that he had notable success when he was one. Also, being the host or creator of a podcast may be noteworthy, but simply just being a guest on one is not.22:43, 26 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iainthompson (talk • contribs)
 * Vote struck and should be discounted, nominator voting twice by trying to sneak by an unsigned contribution.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:12, 30 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Additional comment Subject is on this evening's episode of TWiT, so one part of the nomination rationale that he doesn't appear on podcasts currently is nullified. No change in vote.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 00:08, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.