Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wil Tower


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was NO CONSENSUS TO DELETE. Herostratus 19:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Wil Tower
This article was tagged for speedy delete but does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion. I assume that the problem was that it was not noteworthy enough. I do not have a personal opinion on whether it is or not. Blood red sandman 22:54, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


 * It is a remarkable observation tower in Switzerland. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zonk43 (talk • contribs) 2006-08-24 23:00:01
 * Please cite sources to allow editors to check that assertion. Uncle G 00:41, 25 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. Searching through google.ch seems to point to multiple, independent news stories on the tower. 1234 Leuko 04:08, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Completely run-of-the mill wooden observation tower of strictly local interest. I remember (and can find) no mentions in the mainstream Swiss press. The above sources are not from news media but from local interest websites. Sandstein 17:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;Xyrael / 15:56, 2 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. As is, not verifiably notable. -AED 17:37, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable wooden tower. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 18:02, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Verifiable, but non-notable. Article does not assert its importance.  Do we need an article on every structure in existence? eaolson 22:37, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.