Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wild Games Studio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Day One: Garry's Incident. czar ⨹   13:22, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Wild Games Studio

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The organization existed for four years, made $7 million in revenues and had about 11-50 employees. The only thing they are notable for is the Day One: Garry's Incident, which has its own article and the only purpose of this page is to summarize that one (a purpose already well-served by the Lede). The org does not appear to have done anything else of significance that could produce a general profile separate from the controversy page. CorporateM (Talk) 16:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 21:52, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Day One: Garry's Incident. All coverage I found was related to that game and can be adequately summarised at that article. Sam Walton (talk) 00:00, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Given as it is defunct know, I agree it's unlikely to become known for anything but this one controversy, which is probably better discussed in the game's article, if it isn't already. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:36, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.