Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wild Rose (Rock Band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Wild Rose (Rock Band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't appear to meet WP:BAND. The references are all unremarkable blogs and the "chart" references are for some website called Melodic Net and not Billboard. Justeditingtoday (talk) 20:52, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - author has COI (seems to be member of band) and has only used account for promotional purposes; in addition to that, I'm questioning the reliability of some of the sources provided. MereTechnicality   ⚙  21:00, 19 February 2017 (UTC)


 * I had no idea about the conflicts of interest. I had the suggestion to make this wiki page by a friendly band W.E.T., which in fact has no citation at all and they didn't make the billboard either, but the Swedish chart. I apologize if I have caused any inconvenience. (author) — Preceding unsigned comment added by HarisPatsos (talk • contribs) 21:14, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * That's okay. Just keep in mind the policy on autobiographies and conflicts of interest. MereTechnicality   ⚙  21:25, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I started deletion procedures for WET. Thanks for bringing it to our attention. Kellymoat (talk) 12:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 21:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 21:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)


 * I am typically a delete voter because not everything in life is actually notable. And while I am still voting delete, I think the subject of the article meets the very poor criteria required to be kept. Just because we've never heard of them, doesn't mean that others haven't. They have a albums. They have press coverage. Sometimes I think all it takes is for a press agent to put out some blurbs, and you qualify for a page. But that is something to be discussed in a different forum. Kellymoat (talk) 21:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Just to be clear, even though I have issues with what does and does not qualify under WP guidelines, I am voting delete. Kellymoat (talk) 12:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * COMMENT The page creator, and sole contributor, has been permanently blocked from WP. Kellymoat (talk) 12:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * DeleteSearch tools produce no mention, let alone significant mention of this band. Fails WP:N. Tapered (talk) 04:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)


 * "author has COI (seems to be member of band) and has only used account for promotional purposes; in addition to that, I'm questioning the reliability of some of the sources provided. @MereTechnicality" ???

Hi, Chris here CEO of C.S.Management & Promotions, General Manager of the band and Manager of Lions Pride Music music label (Denmark). First of all sources provided are completely reliable. 1) The bands second album "Dangerous" (AOR Heaven records) hit the number 1 in import sales in the whole Japan in June 2013 (Burrn! Magazine Japan) while Bon Jovi's - What About Now (Island records) album was placed on number 3 on sales and Virtue - We stand to fight (No remorse label) on number 2! (Source Proof from June's 2013 Burrn! Magazine Japan photo,. 2) The band also features a song in the American horror movie which has been released last year called "The Barn" playing in theaters right now in USA, Trailer Picture Proof , Official youtube trailer proof min. 1.45 3) The bands page has also been Verified as unique page by facebook. 4) Their track "Summer Girl" from their latest album "4" was also released in a compilation CD of "Fireworks Magazine" and sold 4000 magazine & CD copies worldwide.

Band member didn't put the band here for promotion as long as if you google the bands name you'll find it all over the internet, he just wants his band to be mentioned in your site as long as many other bands being mentioned here, except Wild Rose for no particular reason of your side. Please reconsider your decision while every proof stated is REAL, and there is no promotional purpuse used.

Thank you very much, Best regards, Chris Siloma Zanidis CEO C.S.Management & Promotions Wild Rose General Manager Lions Pride Music Manager

/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris Siloma Zanidis (talk • contribs) 18:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * You also have a conflict of interest. Kellymoat (talk) 18:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment As Kellymoat says, you have a major conflict of interest. Please read the page. Further, not just your word but anyone's word isn't sufficient to accept a source as reliable. If you read up, you'll see Wikipedia's criteria, which none of the sources listed for the article come close to meeting. This article doesn't belong in Wikipedia. Tapered (talk) 09:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)


 * "Comment" Well if this article doesn't belong to wikipedia then probably, , all these bands and many many more must be deleted as well. I really dunno why I'm an ureliable person while I'm giving to you all proofs about the band while others don't and you still have their bands here. Sorry about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris Siloma Zanidis (talk • contribs) 18:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I hate when people say "but what about these articles". This isn't grade school. There is no "but everyone else is doing it." We aren't grading on a curve. The only thing that matters is the article we are currently discussing. And that article deserves a big fat no. Kellymoat (talk) 18:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:GNG not met. As for the argument about other pages, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS - it's a meaningless argument. Exemplo347 (talk) 18:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)


 * '"Comment'" I never asked; though you can have your opinion, while you don't have the knowledge to express one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris Siloma Zanidis (talk • contribs) 18:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for that barely comprehensible response. Treating these discussions like they're some sort of personal thing is silly - stick to policy-based arguments like everyone else is doing, if you want to be taken seriously. Exemplo347 (talk) 19:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your rarely comprehensible response as well. Treating this article like you don't treat other ones. And as everyone can see; it's a very personal thing, having others here and deleting this article and @Kellymoat responding back to me about childish behaviours?. If you want to be right then be right and accept all bands who achieved a lot with real proofs and leave your beliefs out of it or search them! or have NONE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris Siloma Zanidis (talk • contribs) 19:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * This isn't helping you. Take a step back. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.