Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wild at Heart (environmental group)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  20:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Wild at Heart (environmental group)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Reads like (poorly written) promotion. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 14:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  16:52, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  NuclearWarfare  contact me My work  10:01, 18 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:ORG, although if BJAODN were still around the opening sentence would be a shoo-in: "Fragile environment means when humans have destroyed a environment and now you would have to be very care full with it. For example the Wild At Heart." Ahh, I see. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:16, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * ALL YOUR ENVIRONMENTS ARE NOW BELONG TO US, I guess. --Nlu (talk) 16:29, 19 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.