Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wild reverence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 23:31, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Wild reverence

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Despite the title this article is primarily interested in the fish which are the subject of the film and the film's creator. I can find no evidence that the film itself is notable and the article itself is borderline opinion piece, borderline advertising. RichardOSmith (talk) 18:26, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete While I don't necessarily agree with the nominator about the content of the article (it's an article about a documentary, so the synopsis is going to summarize the film's content, which happens to be about steelhead decline -- you really can't synopsize the film without describing this phenomeon, at least from the filmmaker's viewpoint), I do agree that this film is not notable. It is Anderson's first film as a director; his previous career was as a professional skier, so it's not clear that he's going to receive a lot of attention for this effort. The film is self-produced (he founded North Fork Studios expressly for the purpose of producing this film) and self-financed (apparently through Kickstarter), so there won't be any press about the film's financing. It has not received any notice press yet, outside of the limited Pacific Northwest fly fishing community. (His film does get mentioned at a number of blogs in that community, but no reliable sources.) If it does, then the article can be created then, but not now. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:40, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 23 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Filmmaker:
 * Full title:


 * Delete. While I too disagree with the nominator's interpretation of the article on this documentary film, I used some smarts and found the correct film title and was thus able to make some improvements and added cites to the article. The issue covered is real and of concern to the Pacific Northwest, but despite it screening at multiple film festivals, it has not (yet) gained the coverage to meet inclusion criteria.  Allow undeletion or recreation only if or when WP:NF is met.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 19:37, 23 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 01:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Exactly the same reason as WikiDan61- the sources are limited to a very select community, so fails WP:GNG and wP:NFILM. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:57, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.