Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wild takes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:10, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Wild takes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable subject; 10-year unsourced WP:PERMASTUB neologism. Prodded after WP:BEFORE, but tag removed because it has "incoming wikilinks".  Mini  apolis  00:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. A search of books finds no secondary sources that discuss this term in depth, so non-notable neologism. If the term is defined in a parent article or cartooning glossary, a redirect would be fine by me. But until then, delete. czar  16:16, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:15, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as searches are finding nothing better and there's nothing suggesting better independent notability and improvements. SwisterTwister   talk  02:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.