Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wildcard (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  15:06, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Wildcard (song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No significant indication of notability. The song has only charted at 160 in France, sources are insufficient to establish notability. The Partyscene source is about a remixed version of the song, merely mentioning the original song, hence fails WP:NSONG. Hayman30 (talk) 06:15, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - charted on two national charts and has many sources. My interpretation of the WP:NSINGLE guideline is that a song charting on a national chart suggests it may be notable and additional sources can confirm/verify it, in addition to being created by a notable musician. - The   Magnificentist  07:01, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The song does not warrant its own article as it pretty much has no worthwhile information and should be merged to the artist's article. Almost all written sources are unnotable, one half of the sources, excluding charts and the Only EDM one since it's a blog, are non-English. You are merely adding all supposedly related sources you can find on Google for the sake of saving this article from deletion, as seen from your usage of MP3 download sites as sources and excessive insertion of digital retailer sources. Hayman30 (talk) 08:54, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Non-English sources is not an issue. - The   Magnificentist  08:57, 30 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete the article does not show significant coverage in reviews. The Belgian chart is a bubbling under and the French one outside the Top 100. Sorry, but I cannot see this merit a page under the WP:SONG criteria. Karst (talk) 08:01, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Where did you get the idea that Bubbling Under charts and positions outside the top 100 aren't acceptable? Guidelines clearly say a song charted on a national music chart (regardless of the position), is acceptable. "Significant coverage in reviews"? This topic has been the 'subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label'. - The   Magnificentist  08:21, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The Belgian bubbling under chart is apparently not a "national or significant" chart. Peaking at 160 in France clearly does not establish notability. Hayman30 (talk) 08:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Says you. - The   Magnificentist  08:33, 30 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not notable enough for an article. Little coverage.  Magnolia677 (talk) 01:12, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - as per the above, doesn't meet WP:NSONG. No claim of general notability. Power~enwiki (talk) 03:28, 6 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.