Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilde-World


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete

Wilde-World
Seemingly non-notable blog. Does not appear to meet WP:WEB. Delete. Fightindaman 02:16, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. --TM 02:23, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete NN, scatalogically specific vanity. Moe Aboulkheir 02:42, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB, WP:VSCA, and WP:NOT. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag_of_Texas.svg|30px]] 02:53, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Krash (Talk) 03:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Royboycrashfan -- Samir ∙ [[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|25px| ]]  T   C  08:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete I can actually vouch for this article as it is my blog. The article itself was constructed by two University freinds turned hysterical fans/foes of the blog and while written in a rather ecentric way reflects the history and purpose of the blog quite well. Also scatalogically when looked up in the dictionary is a fancy way of saying that something is poo which isn't very nice for something that two people have put rather (too much) effort into. Also something which seems to be mocking the subject dosen't bring to mind vanity. We will have to agree to disagree on that one. Pudduh 14:21, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete Fair enough this blog doesnt look noteworthy but it does have a cult following and has been featured in several issues of Aberdeen student newspapers "cogno" and the "the gaudie" for its satirical coverage of the RGU election.Mr-turisty 14:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Royboycrash's comments... Localzuk (talk) 16:34, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --AaronS 19:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, looks like vanity as well as NN. ProhibitOnions 22:34, 14 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.