Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:21, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:ROTM mid-size regional law firm that fails WP:NCORP. Only claim to notability for the firm is being involved in some high-profile tobacco litigation in the '80s and '90s, and I'm unable to verify that it played a significant role. It had some notable partners in its early years, but notability is not inherited from them. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 05:30, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 05:30, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 05:30, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 05:30, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Leaning delete. WP:NOTINHERITED applies as much to law firms with partners who went on to fame as it does to anything else. I would be willing to reconsider this position if substantial evidence of national (or at least more than regional) coverage can be shown. I suppose some of the information could be merged into the pages of the founders. BD2412  T 03:14, 6 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.