Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilfred Johnson (pilot)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 00:58, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Wilfred Johnson (pilot)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No claim of notability. Does not meet WP:NMIL or WP:GNG. DFC is not a high order award. Being related to a notable person does not confer notability. MB 03:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. MB 03:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MB 03:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and has no notability as its WP:NOTINHERITED. Mztourist (talk) 07:25, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep- WP:SOLDIER says "In general, an individual is presumed to be notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple verifiable independent, reliable sources." Here are some sources: 1, 2, 3. Chessrat  ( talk, contributions ) 12:49, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, per WP:NOTINHERITED. We can merge all the necessary content to Boris Johnson. —Brigade Piron (talk) 20:19, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not really significant on his own level; a cursory mention in the current Prime Minister's article should be sufficient at best.  RobinCarmody (talk) 00:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:SOLDIER . No credible claim to notability. Being the grandfather of someone who became prime minister confers no notability per WP:NOTINHERITED..  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  19:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - This would make an interesting article if it had more sources than just two sources but otherwise it is not notable.--Blurz (talk) 02:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The first reference look dubious. BlueD954 (talk) 15:34, 3 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.