Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilhelm Servis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nja 247 08:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Wilhelm Servis

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Lack of notability: His only work is the NSC-Engine, which was delete a couple of days ago. Non of his work was cited within the scientific community. Blunt. (talk) 22:06, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources means that notability is not established.  Dawn Bard (talk) 15:55, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Facts
 * 1. Article is about Croatian scientist, and same article is written on hr.wiki
 * 2. His work is known to comunity of machine engineers, both Croatians and Swiss, where he is known.
 * 3. If you want to check and find out who he is, you can ask admins on hr.wiki, we will be glad to respond.
 * 4. As this is article about scientist from one country, and he has established page there, why article is nominated for deletion?

Regards -- Las ta  06:41, 7 July 2009 (UTC)(hr.wiki admin)
 * Do you have any prove, that his work was even referenced once without him being a co-autohr of the paper? His work on the NCS-ENgine wasn't picked up at all and further work is neither claimed in the article nor here. Its basically irrelevant wether there is an article on hr.wiki or not. On de.wiki he was delete three times . Now, before you bring out the nationlism card again like in the AfD-discussion for the engine, could you be so kind to provide links that show some kind of notability? --Blunt. (talk) 23:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 00:07, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Question - Do patents count? He has numerous patents and appears to be an inventor of some significance. I realize that people have patented preposterous things, but his appear substantive. J L G 3 9 2 6  01:53, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 14 search results is not that impressive. The 3 patents listed in the article are only request for patents. --Blunt. (talk) 07:50, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Patenting something is not notable. If the patent was notable itself then it'd receive coverage in WP:RS, but patenting is a lot like self-publishing, so no, a vast number of patents isn't inherently notable (unless perhaps the article was about the man who'd patented the most things in the world, but at that point it'd be WP:OR). Shadowjams (talk) 08:37, 8 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:PROF. Tim Vickers (talk) 00:13, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Remain - In a country where he is coming from, he is regarded as scientist. Nobody disputed that fact, so article stays. --78.3.69.78 (talk) 06:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I did dispute that, because its not proofed. --Blunt. (talk) 15:50, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.