Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilhem scream


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect from typo. `'mikka 00:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Wilhem scream

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Page is a mispelling of an existing page, completely erroneous--Manwithbrisk 18:37, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * This is Articles for deletion. Duplicate articles is along the corridor, third door on the right.  If one editor has been so convinced of a spelling error that they have actually created an article at a mis-spelled title, there will be others in the future.  Uncle G 18:38, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Said page isn't worth a merger, it holds no information that the orginal doesn't, there is no new information to incorperate into the other article, would it not be simpilar to just removed the page altogether?--Manwithbrisk 18:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * That just means that step #2 of the article merger process is a short one. It does not mean that AFD should be involved, and it does not require an administrator to use administrator tools. Uncle G 20:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Wilhelm scream. Metrackle 19:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Close and Redirect. Nuttah68 19:53, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect 8thstar 20:41, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Close and Redirect. Davidicke 21:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy close amd redirect 23skidoo 23:31, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy close and redirect --Canley 00:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.