Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilkins Media Holdings, LLC

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate wasdelete. Woohookitty 15:55, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

Wilkins Media Holdings, LLC
Not notable-- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 03:46, 22 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Appears to have a very weak Internet presence, which is to say none at all (the single Google hit is unrelated). A cursory search reveals nothing even related to this company. While this doesn't necessarily mean anything, it does reinforce the notion that the company is non-notable. Aerion//talk 04:29, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete promo. Gazpacho 04:30, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable company. Dcarrano 15:48, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete promo. Gazpacho 04:30, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable company. Dcarrano 15:48, July 22, 2005 (UTC)

You people are NON-NOTABLE: delete, delete, delete, delete, delete, delete, delete, delete, delete !!! That is all you know. Does that make you feel strong? Are we superior yet?
 * Unsigned comment by anon 66.30.99.56, the author of the article at issue. Aerion//talk 17:14, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, we're all quite non-notable, which is why we don't have Wikipedia articles about ourselves. If it makes you feel better, I'll use a different word, like "destroy." (I think I like that better anyway. Destroy all vanity articles!) Aerion//talk 17:14, 22 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete nn self promotion. JamesBurns 04:02, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

Please excuse my previous statements- I understand that you are doing the best that you can to adhere to the standards that Wikipedia has set. I also know that this project would be a massive mess of abstract data if those policies were not in place, and strictly enforced.

What I believe should be taken into consideration though, is that the Internet does not record enough information that is due a notable status. My uncle (Herbert Wilkins) is clearly notable. But because of his low profile, and insider status, not much has been released in "publicity" structure.

My reasons for initiating inclusions to Wikipedia are simply to create an "educational presence" for members of my family that have not been noted by other "educational" mediums. My background is also "notable" in that I have had special relationships with historical figures in the finance and music industries.

My personal intention is to administer to this information, and help with the massive linking work that is associated with it. What I am asking is the time to do so, and an open perspective to what is deemed as notable, and historical. William H. Wilkins III- 07.22.05- 1:24 pm/est historical. William H. Wilkins III- 07.22.05- 1:24 pm/est


 * Do you have any proof of this company's holdings being notable or famous? The founders?  The current owner?  Wikipedia is not for creating a presence, on;ly reporting on existing presences.  The fact the that you claim to have "special relationships" with "historical figures" doesn't help.  names might.
 * My vote's delete, if you couldn't tell. humblefool&reg; 18:25, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. A lot of people have associations with famous people.  A certain roadie may have toured with The Rolling Stones or U2.  Someone may be a PA (personal assistant) to a Hollywood celeb.  Or someone may have been Bill Gates' kindergarden teacher.  These associations still don't make them notable in any way, unless they've managed some accomplishments of their own. --Madchester 22:24, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn vanity/ad/promotion. -- Etacar11   23:41, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

Shall my humble and simplified modification to a standard dictionary description withstand the cold, steely, knives of thy honored Senate?? William H. Wilkins III- 07.26.05- 11:25 pm/est
 * HEAR ME MY FELLOW NOBLES!
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.