Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Will Pearson - Panoramic Photographer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite 00:31, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Will Pearson - Panoramic Photographer

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable, links to website have also been spammed across multiple articles. Suspect article creator has admitted COI - is the subject's fiance. Mfield (talk) 17:28, 5 December 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete - reliable sources to establish notability lacking (there's the one vrmag link that seems legit and reliable enough, but hardly sufficient), also spammy.--Boffob (talk) 18:55, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:14, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:24, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:25, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Despite being credited on multiple sites the person fails WP:CREATIVE. There is also an issue of obvious COI and the manner in which the article has been created. LeaveSleaves talk 21:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment COI or the manner in which an article has been created is not a reason to delete, but a reason for cleanup. The only question here should concern notability. --Crusio (talk) 21:42, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I have provided the reason for delete already. The second sentence is a mere comment. And by the way, WP:NOT needs to be considered with notability. LeaveSleaves talk 21:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - no real assertion of notability. --Blowdart | talk 00:34, 11 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.