Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Will it carbonate?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow delete. There really is no hope for this article. J I P &#124; Talk 21:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Will it carbonate?

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is blatant original research. A set of articles on "food and drink that can be carbonated" likely fails WP:NLIST as well. As a result, I believe that this article should be deleted. — Mhawk10 (talk) 04:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — Mhawk10 (talk) 04:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Obviously unencyclopedic Reywas92Talk 04:55, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Fails WP:NLIST. KidAd  •  SPEAK  05:23, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 06:03, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 06:03, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Not eligible for speedy deletion, and deprodded by creator, but the WP:NOT issues start from the title, which resembles a science fair project. I can name WP:NOTGUIDE, WP:IINFO, and the section related to the WP:OR policy. –<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b> ( d c̄ ) 06:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:SNOW delete It might not be eligible for speedy deletion, but it is profoundly WP:NOT and there is absolutely no good faith argument for keeping. Let's just get it over with. Mlb96 (talk) 07:47, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Snow delete Wikipedia is not a knockoff of a popular meme. Belongs on MrBeast’s YouTube channel, not an encyclopedia. More like “will it delete?” (Yes). On a trivial note my favorite is “Hot Dog: carbonates: No; improves taste: N/A”. Throwing science at the wall to see what sticks, I guess… Dronebogus (talk) 09:12, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - complete waste of time dePROD. Clear WP:OR and WP:NOT on several counts. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:19, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Snow delete Very funny, but doesn't belong here. Mako001 (talk) 11:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:SNOW. WikiJoeB (talk) 14:05, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:DEL-REASON #8 and #14 —¿philoserf? (talk) 16:03, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly WP:OR if the article itself contains the line you can also experiment with various substances yourself. snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 16:45, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete literally no point for this article to exist. HelpingWorld (talk) 20:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Snow delete. Unencyclopedic, unreferenced, original research, pointless. J I P  &#124; Talk 20:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.