Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William "Bill" Couzens


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 17:30, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

William "Bill" Couzens

 * – ( View AfD View log )

With apologies to the editor, I do not believe this person is notable by our standards. What seems to be the best reference, from IndiaTimes, is actually no more than a link to a PR release. Other coverage is minor, and the plethora of photographs (with famous people...) is too puffy. Drmies (talk) 18:25, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 26 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment I disagree. What would deem him acceptable according to your standards? His work in cancer prevention appears as notable as some of the other notables listed through Wikipedia. (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC).
 * Comment Note previous recent deletion after AfD on 20th Sept: . And the history shows a subsequent speedy after re-creation. AllyD (talk) 20:41, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Nom and the previous AfD. No sources to be found. Bgwhite (talk) 21:55, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete - Lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. There are references in the article.  The Indiatimes "article" is actually an excerpt from a press release.  The Middleburg Eccentric is a local community newspaper/magazine published monthly. AskMissA is of unclear reliability.  The New York Time is an engagement announcement.  Taken together, that's insufficient to meet the inclusion guidelines. (Note: this is the exact same rationale as I used at the previous AFD because it's the exact same sources in the article again). -- Whpq (talk) 17:05, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.