Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Bartruff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 10:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

William Bartruff

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Disputed prod. Reason for prod was "notability lacking from reliable sources. Created by member of family; a conflict of interest". See talk page for reason for removal of prod. Despite entry on talk page, the first two references are references to subject's own website, and I could not see anything of relevance in the 3rd, but I might have missed something. So I stick with my original contention: non-notable according to reliable sources; only significant editor has a conflict of interest. Akihabara 15:05, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete something there yet problems with WP:COI and WP:RS makes me tend to delete. If it gets cleaned up according to wiki standards by end of this AfD it could make me change my vote Alf photoman 16:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems interesting but Google Books, Google Scholar and Google News Archive all come up zilch. Can't have just primary sources or COI. --Dhartung | Talk 06:24, 19 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.