Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Blumberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  09:17, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

William Blumberg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable tennis player. Fails WP:NTENNIS and WP:GNG. Adamtt9 (talk) 13:19, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. The infobox says it all. Career record 0-0, ranking 1362. Fails WP:GNG.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 13:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - ridiculously non-notable. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:17, 6 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:16, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:17, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:17, 6 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as an amateur, he's clearly not notable today. He likely will be notable in a few years, but WP:CRYSTAL. Power~enwiki (talk) 18:53, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not only does Blumberg have zero appearances in any ATP-level events (which would garner presumed notability), but he also has zero appearances in second-level Challenger events (which usually require a win to meet notability guidelines), and only one match played in third-level ITF Futures tournaments - a loss to Adam Pavlasek in 2014. His appearance(s?) in NCAA Div 1 tournaments do not meet the guidelines for team participation either, which only cover Davis Cup participants (and likely Hopman Cup, although I don't think an otherwise non-notable player has ever participated there). Whether or not NCAA participation and coverage combined with minor (but GNG-failing) participation in Challenger events could combine for notability may be up for debate in the future, but as it stands right now Blumberg doesn't even come close to meeting any of the notability guidelines. Sellyme Talk 19:40, 11 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.