Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Cleveland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:35, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

William Cleveland

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Questionably notable and improvable as the best my searches found were this, this and this so if there's no better improvement here, this should be replaced with a disambiguation page for the two other William Cleveland (and I was going to but I wanted comments first). Pinging and. SwisterTwister  talk  23:18, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:20, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:20, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:20, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 19:11, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Not generally notable, based on lack of sources, and not notable as an author. One of his books, Art and Upheaval, has a page even though it has no references. It, too, should be presented at AfD. LaMona (talk) 04:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete His name makes it a bit difficult, but all I can really find is passing references to him and his organization which aren't substantial and some reviews of his book. Nsteffel (talk) 22:14, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete unless substantial coverage in independent and reliable sources can be turned up, as has not happened yet in the time this AfD has been open. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom and above editors. Searches did not reveal enough to show they meet either WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR. And I agree with regarding his book as well. Searches there turned up very little, and I've nominated it as well.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:58, 29 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.