Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Deresiewicz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep. --Eyrian 18:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

William Deresiewicz

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:PROF; note I created this, but now agree with the speedy tag. Formulafiftypoet 17:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep and close. His publications in the New York Times and The Nation alone  - multiple times, no less - dictate that he is, indeed notable.  Speedy close becuase I'm seeing a pattern: based on his nominations of other articles here in AFD and his protests of another AFD (see his contributions), I am unable to assume good faith on this nominator, and do declare that he is attempting to prove a point.  This time, since he can't get his way elsewise, he wants to delete his own creations.  -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 17:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.   —Espresso Addict 18:21, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep and close per above. Like the tiger above, I can't assume good faith here due to the nom's actions. This person is indeed notable, and VERY well sourced -- that's probably the highest ratio of sources to article length that I've ever seen though. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 18:42, 20 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.