Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Hamman (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:54, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

William Hamman
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable individual. Got a flutter of news coverage at the time, but isn't otherwise notable. Pepper Beast   (talk)  13:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:25, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:25, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:25, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per WP:BLP1E and WP:CRIME. Subject passed as a doctor for some time (despite lacking a medical degree), which got a brief spike of news coverage.  Little other sign of notability, and I don't think there's enough to overcome WP:BLP1E. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 15:06, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete appears to be an attack page and not realy a suitable encyclopedia entry, might qualify for speedy G10. MilborneOne (talk) 07:28, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete what that guy was messed up but it's not important enough to warrant its own page. I'm sure even the subject of the page doesn't want this on Wikipedia... BuySomeApples (talk) 18:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Despite arguments to the contrary at the first discussion, the subject did not appear to meet WP:GNG even at the time, and any argument that there was news coverage can plausibly be explained away by WP:NOTNEWS. Ultimately, this is a WP:BLP1E of an individual, and lasting encyclopedic notability has not been demonstrated. -- Kinu t/c 04:25, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.