Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Henry (historian)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:05, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

William Henry (historian)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails to establish notability and he appears to be another run-of-the-mill historian. Jrcla2 (talk) 00:48, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Normally I would say that an historian with 8 published books in notable, but not one is from a notable academic publisher, some are even self published, and none are in more than 40 worldcat libraries.    DGG ( talk ) 04:42, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. [tk]   XANDERLIPTAK  15:58, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete This is close, I think. As of now, I'm doubtful--but if someone with a knowledge of Irish historiagraphy weighed in, I'd likely defer to their wisdom VASterling (talk) 19:01, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.