Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Heyward


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, due to the sources provided; the article still needs a lot of work, but notability has been shown. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :)  19:16, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

William Heyward

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable. Has had a busy career, but does not meet Wikipedia standards Written like a resume. &mdash; G716  &lt;T·C&gt; 12:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC) Delete I can't see anything he has done that is notable, and there are no references that claim notability either. Arsenikk (talk)  12:27, 12 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   -- &mdash; G716  &lt;T·C&gt; 12:22, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.   —John Z (talk) 20:51, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Several articles on Pubmed. Homepage claims (http://www.williamheyward.com/awards.html) that he has several significant awards. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 22:41, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr.Z-man 23:38, 16 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: Non-notable. His home page claiming that he won awards is not good because it could be a lie. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 00:01, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Don't want to be too politically correct but I'd prefer to call that a possibly biased source.   SIS   00:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - I think he meets WP:BIO. There's this, this , this, and this  for a start. And there's this nasty little slip but for some reason that's not mentioned in his article. ;-)    SIS   00:21, 17 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.