Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Johnson (author)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy keep as per guidelines. Capitalistroadster 00:23, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

William Johnson (author)
Not notable; vanity/advertising page for someone who wrote a book, with article written by his publisher. Joejamboree 06:55, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep author has written books with some notabily. Found on Amazon and Biblio.com. I do not beleve it is vanity, it was started by a user with good track history on wikipedia, and who often votes on AfDs. This is probably a bad faith nomination. --Ezeu 07:27, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. --Ter e nce Ong 07:38, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Ezeu. note that this afd is nominators only edit -- Astrokey44 |talk 09:31, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep no indication this is vanity or advertising; as Ezeu has stated, article author has a good track record here and by all indications this is a good faith attempt at starting a stub about William Johnson. I'm not completely convinced Mr. Johnson or his work are notable, but nom didn't really lay out an adequate argument for deletion.--Isotope23 18:25, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep --PZ 19:01, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as above. Monicasdude 20:44, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep notable Funky Monkey 23:00, 15 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.