Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Krisel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 03:46, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

William Krisel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable subject with unverified claims Kavdiamanju (talk) 04:30, 9 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Subject appears to be notable and the information in the article is cited. Pishcal  — ♣ 05:50, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 9 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. It was easy to find an extended treatment of the partnership's tract houses - focusing on Krisel's architecture - in a book. There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate notability. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:01, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable architect,  Hafspajen (talk) 21:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.