Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Manealoff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Master list of Nixon's political opponents. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

William Manealoff

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (biographies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. And yes, I looked for sources that would describe him in relation to the Nixon issue, and I couldn't find much beyond a few passing mentions here and there, mostly in transcripts (so, WP:PRIMARY). The PROD was removed with no useful rationale despite my explicit request to add one or comment on talk :( Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  01:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  01:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:48, 13 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Master_list_of_Nixon's_political_opponents since it seems his major claim to significance derives from that shitlist. If you see articles like this in future (badly sourced microstubs on topics completely dependent on some other list) just redirect them right away rather than going the PROD route. Reyk YO! 14:51, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Master_list_of_Nixon's_political_opponents. Nika2020 (talk) 18:16, 13 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.