Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Morris (Next Century Foundation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:36, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

William Morris (Next Century Foundation)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

As with Articles for deletion/Next Century Foundation, I would prefer let the community decide this one than axe it with CSD-based deletion. The official reason for the CSD listing is A7. TomStar81 (Talk) 01:23, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:29, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:29, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 17:18, 16 April 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Needs more discussion given the age of the article.
 * Delete - I'm not sure this is a slam dunk WP:A7 candidate, but it is with WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Nothing about this article reads as reliable and there is hardly any coverage that's independent of the subject, let alone coverage that is credible. The same issues exist with Next Century Foundation, and I'll be making a similar comment on that discussion. AP1787 (talk) 01:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:39, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. feminist (talk) 04:56, 29 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG likely WP:HOAX Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:38, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to guarantee him inclusion in Wikipedia just because he exists, but the sourcing is not helping to get him over WP:GNG — it's referenced almost entirely to YouTube videos and the self-published websites of organizations he's directly affiliated with and raw tables of election results that are not support for notability, with virtually no evidence of any reliable source coverage about him for the purposes of establishing the significance of any of this. Bearcat (talk) 15:32, 1 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.