Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Ng


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 18:39, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

William Ng

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:Vanispamcruftisement with no indication of notability per WP:BIO, and no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources, just passing mentions and quotes. Speedy deletion for spam declined by admin. Captain Conundrum (talk) 15:01, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Captain Conundrum (talk) 15:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Captain Conundrum (talk) 15:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  17:44, 29 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, non-notable WP:BIO. Dea  db  eef  20:19, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Vanispamcruftisement indeed. 1292simon (talk) 12:57, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep I think this one passes the general notability guideline. News sources from numerous countries and secondary sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AfflictedNow (talk • contribs) 16:41, 2 May 2013 (UTC)  — AfflictedNow (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Could you explain how you think it passes WP:GNG please? 1292simon (talk) 22:27, 3 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete On the surface, it seems possible this person is notable, but I was unable to find any significant coverage of this person by reliable sources. Transcendence (talk) 20:08, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.