Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Pitcock (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:05, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

William Pitcock
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non notable software author. Falcon8765 (talk) 03:15, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete this person is not notable, and I still believe qualifies for A7 66.93.203.152 (talk) 06:59, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment noting the lack of response received, it can only re-iterate my position that this article should go. 66.93.203.152 (talk) 20:35, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:33, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR. The only coverage about him, personally, is a Free Software Magazine post that's neither an article or column. Pcap ping  18:03, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete News search has only 2 hits that are him, and one is a support blog ??. I don't see evidence of notability.  David V Houston (talk) 01:30, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.