Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Pooley (Ebola patient)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to  Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa. I'm not sure this will prove to be the ultimately best redirect, but it's a way to start out. What is clear is that it should not be a separate article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:04, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

William Pooley (Ebola patient)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

obvious WP:BLP1E Jytdog (talk) 15:32, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  15:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  15:49, 15 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa. It's possible BLP1E does not apply because Pooley has made public statements and thus may not be low-profile, but even then, WP:BIO1E applies. He is the second (not even first!) British person to develop Ebola, and is not particularly notable past that. His case is already discussed on the main article and in ZMapp. Xqxf (talk) 15:56, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I would be OK with the redirect.Jytdog (talk) 16:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect as well. Beyond the fact this guy got sick, there is nothing notable about him. He doesn't need his own article. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 19:10, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep The Guardian article is certainly substantial coverage, and that fact that he is planning to go back to Africa to continue his work shows that he is more than just a guy that got sick. BayShrimp (talk) 22:02, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If he does additional notable things past catching Ebola virus, and it is covered by references, then he might be more than that. But just having plans to go back to Africa doesn't show any notability. Xqxf (talk) 22:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 16 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect as a WP:BLP1E and the original prod nominee Secret account 02:58, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Obviously, this person is notable for only one thing, but even in the article's description of catching Ebola, coverage of his story in the article is weak. If he gets Ebola again, or does something otherwise notable, we can un-redirect. – Epicgenius (talk) 00:56, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect as an obvious BLP1E case.  G loss  21:47, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment, just so folks know, there are articles like List of Ebola patients and Healthcare workers contracting ebola (I know, wrong space -  i have asked its creator to move it).  But i am more concerned with the desire to create articles on these individuals and list their names in WP. I am aware of 3 AfDs: this one and Articles for deletion/Ruth Atkins (UK nurse) and  Articles for deletion/Thomas Eric Duncan.  Jytdog (talk) 07:35, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect Having an article on every person who gets the disease just because the mainstream media is crazy is not good encyclopedia writing. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 09:43, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect. per above Cannolis (talk) 16:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, redirect is an implausible search term. Abductive  (reasoning) 15:32, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect or Delete. This is a BLP1E and does not qualify for an entire article dedicated to this person. WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:44, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, obvious BLP1E case. Titanium Dragon (talk) 08:03, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.