Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Redford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 10:59, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

William Redford

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As indicated on Talk:William Redford, the only reference that asserts Redford as the subject is a Bloomberg bio profile. Fails WP:GNG. Jppcap (talk) 19:56, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:37, 14 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as my searches noticeably found nothing better at all and there's nothing for at least basic notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:18, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep The chief executive of a former quoted company (Eligere Investments) as confirmed by reliable sources including Bloomberg and London Stock Exchange. Managing director of Mareeba Group as confirmed by the London Stock Exchange. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:02, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * This is still questionable for the necessary solid independent notability improvements though and there's nothing convincing these can be made. SwisterTwister   talk  23:05, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * He has recently been involved in litigation in Gibraltar in which a freezing order was granted. I am not sure if this has all been written up by RSs yet. I have tried to make it a bit clearer and added a couple of refs. Try reading Belvedere Management. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I think its a lot stronger now. Please take a look. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Subscription RS's added do not contain Redford as the subject, independent of the company, to meet WP:GNG. Jppcap (talk) 21:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, they do, in the title and in the text. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.