Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Riefkohl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. –MuZemike 23:04, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

William Riefkohl

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Individual doesn't seem to quite rise above the notability threshold. Fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:PROF, and WP:BIO in general. Snotty Wong  comment 17:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * "Delete' - per nom; seemingly fails WP:NOTABLE NickCT (talk) 17:37, 7 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - the man is notable and is in the Puertorican newspapers in an almost weekly basis.  El Johnson (talk) 19:14, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I believe that the awards that the subject has received, plus the fact that the media considers him to be sufficient notable as to merit coverage is more then enough reason to keep this article. Tony the Marine (talk) 19:42, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - search did provide reliable media coverage in newspapers such as Chicago Tribune and Sun Times. Infinitely Humble (talk) 21:09, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Puerto Rican who has been prominent in the private sector (top leader of the PR Manufacturers Association) and public sector (former president of Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company) alike. Pr4ever (talk) 10:54, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.