Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Roshko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:58, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

William Roshko

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article currently has four primary sources and one unreliable source. I have not been able to find any reliable secondary sources to establish notability. GB fan 22:47, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree with GB, even if said sources were found, the article would require an entire rewrite, as it seems to lack sufficient context to understand the notability of the subject. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:40, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete article is of some interest but I'm not seeing substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Might be worth merging to a parent subject? Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:17, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:17, 30 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete The article asserts what he did is notable - educate Congress on burdensome case loads of SSDI judges leading to unnecessary disability payouts - but the sources don't support that it is notable. Furthermore if that is all he did it might qualify under WP:BLP1E. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 16:54, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.