Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William S. Hobson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  → Call me  Hahc  21  05:26, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

William S. Hobson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article on a scientist with no evidence of meeting WP:NACADEMICS e.g. not a professor, no major awards, etc. No reliable 3rd party references that show notability, fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Tassedethe (talk) 16:18, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:11, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:11, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:11, 23 March 2014 (UTC)


 *  Delete Keep. A GS h-index of around 37 is quite enough to pass WP:Prof in a well-cited field.  Xxanthippe (talk) 21:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC).
 * While the article needs a lot of work, he appears to pass WP:SCHOLAR per Xxanthippe. Keep. Bearian (talk) 21:06, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Although not a typical academic career, scientific production and impact pass WP:SCHOLAR.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 13:12, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.