Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Smith (Locksley Guard)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:24, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

William Smith (Locksley Guard)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article is for a fictional character that is seemingly not sourced from anywhere mrg3105 (comms) ♠ ♥ ♦ ♣ 03:58, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article does not meet WP:FICT, written like a fansite besides. TN ‑ X - Man  19:12, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FICT and WP:V. Happyme22 (talk) 19:19, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete By the article's own admission, this is a fanfic character and thus not notable. Edward321 (talk) 04:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

I think it should stay! Hamlet is a fictional character and has space here and do not start me on religion! William Smith may well one day become immortalised in literatureand deserves to be so surely an early and visible copyright and entry is a good thing! Besides the main protagonists always have their own page (Robin Hood for example) William Smith is stands for the never named henchmen who seem to exist for the "good guy" to run through! Eiskitten (talk) 18:59, 3 June 2008 (UTC) — Eiskitten (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.