Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Stuart Michelson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

William Stuart Michelson

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No indication of significance. Blatant family promotionalism. WP:PROMO. Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO.  scope_creep Talk  23:13, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Radio, Military, Engineering, Norway,  and Georgia (U.S. state).  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:23, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can't find anything on GS. Maybe someone else can. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, family promotionalism that belongs on linkedin or similar not here. Does not meet WP:NACADEMIC or WP:GNG. Melcous (talk) 02:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep I don’t see any issue. In its current form appears to rise to the level of WP:NACADEMIC. Western sheriff (talk) 22:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
 * This editor is a WP:SPA. There is a not a single criteria in NACADEMIC that the subject meets.   scope_creep Talk  23:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete, as per above. No indication of notability sufficient for a Wikipedia page. Ldm1954 (talk) 00:41, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above, does not meet WP:NBIO, no coverage in reliable secondary sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cocobb8 (talk • contribs)
 * Keep The subject meets WP:NACADEMIC criteria. Subject is notable in higher / tertiary education as an educator at Georgia Tech and researcher at Georgia Tech Research Institute in specific academic fields Human systems engineering and Human–computer interaction and as an organizer of an international collegiate events impacting a number of academic institutions. Subject is an elected leader of established national organizations in multiple domains (professional technical societies/associations and non-profits e.g. National Defense Industrial Association and Trail Life USA). Recent editing efforts have been focused on improving the page and correcting identified deficiencies. This article can be improved. This article exceeds the source quality and content of the majority of comparable research academics found at the "Category:Georgia Tech Research Institute people" page and mirrors in many cases the sources used across the University System of Georgia and the Georgia Institute of Technology. The remedy for this article is continued improvement, not deletion. An article such as this has potential even if not perfect in its current state. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IcemanCalvin (talk • contribs) 17:25, 11 March 2024 (UTC)  — IcemanCalvin (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Question and  which of the eight specific criteria at WP:NACADEMIC are you suggesting is met? And please provide WP:RS to confirm. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 23:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete above keep !votes from WP:SPAs fundamentally misunderstand WP:NACADEMIC (along with WP:COI, but that's another story). Purely a promotional puff piece authored by the subject's father. &#126;~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete can't find any suggestion of notability  -- Devoke  water  14:23, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a venue for promotion and the comments by the SPAs should be disregarded. All individuals must meet WP:BASIC. AusLondonder (talk) 14:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wow. The article led to believe I'd be able to find something. I did not. -- asilvering (talk) 16:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.