Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Tam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

William Tam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The events were obviously notable, but I don't think Tam himself can be construed notable by himself. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 18:07, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 1 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete The role he played in the proceedings was small and did not receive a lot of coverage. He is mentioned at the article Hollingsworth v. Perry so a redirect to that article might be possible, but I think deletion would be more appropriate; that one mention does not do justice to his biography. --MelanieN (talk) 01:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 20:09, 9 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.