Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Willes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigmamsg 21:37, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

William Willes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable subject that does not meet WP:BASIC. Coverage found in searches for independent, reliable sources is limited to a couple of name checks. The primary sources in the article are not usable to establish notability. North America1000 22:27, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:27, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:27, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:28, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 11:06, 5 August 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 11:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I hate to do this, because I think we should allow articles on hymn creators as such. But since writting widely published hymns is not a default sign of notability, we really have nothing showing that Willes is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:46, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete – Per nom + He's a failed missionary who led some random college. He made no contributions to the Mormon Church other than two hymns. No notable independent sources. Redditaddict69 13:02, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources do not provide significant coverage that would allow this BLP to pass the GNG. Chetsford (talk) 16:51, 19 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.