Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Wilson (soccer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

William Wilson (soccer)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL--Alza08 (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 9.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 07:15, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Never played in the top grade as a starting player. WWGB (talk) 07:28, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - 3 appearances in the FFA Cup, which means he meets NFOOTBALL, as they were appearances in a competitive match between two teams from WP:FPL. Needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 18:29, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete the sourcing does not meet GNG. The sports SNGs are very clear and it has been established by RfC that all articles under sports SNGs still need to meet GNG. We need to delete this article. It is high time we returned Wikipedia to being an encyclopedia, and stopped it being a sports results database. 50% of BLPs are on sports people and 40% are on people playing games that are called "football". This is just plain not a reasonable balance for an encyclopedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:03, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Never played in top grade. Also fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 02:58, 11 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.