Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Williams Murray Hamm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JohnCD (talk) 20:18, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Williams Murray Hamm

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I cannot find significant coverage for this firm.  — fetch ·  comms   02:05, 27 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep I've added some references to the article. Based on the coverage of the sources and the number of awards that they've won, the group seems notable. Silver  seren C 04:10, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 *  Keep  The gnews hits though most of them based on PR are enough to show them a major design company.  DGG ( talk ) 04:12, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep obivous keeper. per references. notability.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 11:01, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm very leery of business-related entries, but this one is sourced and done right. Carrite (talk) 16:54, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete The various references cited are the kind of industrial awards which exist solely for the purpose of creating notability - even the mentioning of the brands like Horlicks and the like seems to be spun to alude to inflate the company's notability. What we need to see is the actual design campaigns which have entered the public consciousness - what logos / packaging were designed for these companies? PoisonedPigeon (talk) 10:41, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.