Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Williams revolution


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0 [ talk ] 02:18, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Williams revolution
The page describes a neologism coined by a Wikipedia editor and is historically inaccurate. No one outside of Wikipedia has ever used the term. Extensive discussion on Talk:Williams revolution Graft 14:58, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless Dunc or anyone else has more info that we missed. Joe D (t) 16:41, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism/original research. - Bobet 16:41, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with arguments (some by me) in Talk:Williams revolution. The content of the article has already been merged into Gene-centered view of evolution by Samsara, so there is no loss of content. Links to "Williams Revolution" should be changed to links to Gene-centered view of evolution.-- MayerG 20:26, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the detailed argument given on Talk:Williams revolution. Samsara 21:11, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination and talk page. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-11 21:18Z 
 * Delete (reluctantly...) Mikkerpikker 00:47, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. See my talk, Samsara talk. Alan Peakall 17:55, 14 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.