Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willona Woods


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Good Times.  MBisanz  talk 20:55, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Willona Woods

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of its series through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement. TTN (talk) 15:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC) 
 * Comment This should at least be redirected to Good Times. Zagalejo^^^ 07:26, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as article has no evidence of having received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject and is wholly constitutive of plot. —   pd_THOR  undefined | 14:54, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Major character in a major series. I'd have no objection to a merge to a character list, but there doesn't seem to be one at the moment.  Plenty of news hits . In fact a huge number for that old of a show.  Books also have a large number of passing references.  Enough in my opinion to establish notability.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by hobit (talk • contribs) 19:49, 3 November 2008
 * Merge as for the other characters to an article for them all. Individual ones in such a list need not be Notable--there is no such requirement for indiviual items of article content. No reason given applies as an objection to this--suitable descriptive content can come from the fiction itself. As for keeping a separate article, at this point it does not really make sense until there are some kind of sources. Lets work towards a compromise on these. DGG (talk) 18:17, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   kur  ykh   22:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   -- RayAYang (talk) 23:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge or redirect No indication of notability apart from the series. Merge to a character list or redirect to the series article. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Almost certainly received coverage in multiple reliable sources, so deletion is not appropriate.  Redirect is an option if article is unlikely to be improved soon.  Regular editors of Good Times can make use of the revision history. Squidfryerchef (talk) 04:20, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 8 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.